Sort by
Refine Your Search
-
Listed
-
Category
-
Employer
- University of Aveiro
- University of Minho
- Universidade de Coimbra
- Universidade do Minho
- Associação do Instituto Superior Técnico para a Investigação e Desenvolvimento _IST-ID
- Universidade Católica Portuguesa - Porto
- Universty of Aveiro
- FEUP
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança
- Instituto de Engenharia Mecânica
- LNEC, I.P.
- CIIMAR - Interdisciplinary Center of Marine and Environmental Research - Uporto
- Centro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade de Coimbra
- Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto
- Gulbenkian Institute for Molecular Medicine
- IBMC
- ICETA - Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente da Universidade do Porto
- Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P.
- Instituto Superior Técnico
- International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory (INL)
- Universidade Nova de Lisboa
- Universidade do Algarve
- Universidade do Porto – HR
- 14 more »
- « less
-
Field
-
the application fits (20%); The evaluation panel may invite the highest ranking candidates (up to 3) for an interview. In this case the final classification system for candidates is expressed on a scale from 0 to
-
methods are as follows: curricular evaluation (CE) with a weighting of 70% and, optionally, complemented by an interview (INT) with a weighting of 30%, which will only take place when the Jury considers
-
consultation model for patients with palliative care needs. Key Tasks and Responsibilities The successful candidate will be expected to: a) Refine the study protocol, prepare interview schedules, and manage the
-
CIIMAR - Interdisciplinary Center of Marine and Environmental Research - Uporto | Portugal | 16 days ago
to 10 values. If deemed necessary, the jury may interview the first 3 candidates to clarify aspects related to the research results. This interview will be graded on a scale from 0 to 20, and will have a
-
deemed necessary by the jury, an interview may be conducted with the two best-ranked candidates, afterwhich the final ranking will be determined based on their performance in the interview. Composition
-
45%; b) Personal curriculum (considering professional and scientific background), with a weighting of 45%; 1 If a second evaluation method is fixed – Interview, it may not have a weighting higher than
-
are curricular evaluation and an interview session. 5.2 — The evaluation of the scientific and curricular course focuses on the relevance, quality, and timeliness: a) Of scientific, technological, cultural
-
methods are curricular evaluation and interview. 5.2 — The evaluation of the scientific and curricular course focuses on the relevance, quality, and timeliness: a) Of scientific, technological, cultural
-
interview. 5.2 — The evaluation of the scientific and curricular course focuses on the relevance, quality, and timeliness: a) Of scientific, technological, cultural, or artistic production in the last five
-
Evaluation (AC) – weight of 60%; Interview (ENT) – weight of 40%, optional. The interview will only take place if the Jury considers that the curriculum evaluation is not sufficient to clarify candidates