-
literature review on New European Bauhaus principles and analyze the specific urban challenge of the assigned demonstrator site. - Select and define the specific digital tools or participatory methods (e.g
-
requirements I.I - Grant Recipients: Masters in Chemical Engineering, Materials Engineering, Chemistry, enrolled in a PhD program or a non-degree course. OR Master’s degree holders, in the scientific area of
-
- Selection Methods: Evaluation of the academic record (AR) VII.I - AR - In the evaluation of the academic record, the candidates' academic performance will be assessed according to the following weights and
-
Regional Development Fund (ERDF), through the Innovation and Digital Transition Program (COMPETE 2030) of Portugal 2030. VII - Selection Methods: Evaluation of the academic record (AR) and/or Interview (I
-
- Selection Methods: Evaluation of the academic record (AR) VII.I - AR - In the evaluation of the academic record, the candidates' academic performance will be assessed according to the following weights and
-
outputs in force at FCT. VII - Selection Methods: Evaluation of the academic record (AR) VII.I - AR - In the evaluation of the academic record, the candidates' academic performance will be assessed
-
Republic must be displayed. VII - Selection Methods: Evaluation of the academic record (AR) and Interview (I) VII.I - AR - In the evaluation of the academic record, the candidates' academic performance will
-
support of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), through the Regional Programme (CENTRO 2030) of Portugal 2030. [LM8.1] VII - Selection Methods: Evaluation of the academic record (AR) and/or
-
own revenue. VI.V - Information and publicity about the funding: N/A VII - Selection Methods: Evaluation of the academic record (AR) – 50% and Interview (I) – 50% VII.I - AR - In the evaluation
-
Inovação e Transição Digital (COMPETE 2030) of Portugal 2030, must be explicitly mentioned. VII - Selection Methods: Evaluation of the academic record (AR) and Interview (I) VII.I - AR - In the evaluation