Sort by
Refine Your Search
-
Listed
-
Category
-
Program
-
Field
-
be awarded preferably to a candidate that demonstrates: experience with FPGA programming; knowledge about methods and tools for profiling FPGA-accelerated applications; proficiency in reading and
-
components, namely: The assessment of the curriculum vitae and other documentation presented is made in according to point 8 of this notice. This component of the evaluation is expressed in a scale of 0 to 100
-
, ranking the candidates according to their classification consisting on the sum of the partial classifications assigned in each evaluation criterion, and considering the weighting factor given to each
-
the weighting factor given to each parameter. In this process abstentions are not allowed. In the event of a tie among candidates with the same highest evaluation score, the Evaluation Panel reserves the right
-
to their classification consisting on the sum of the partial classifications assigned in each evaluation criterion, and considering the weighting factor given to each parameter. In this process abstentions are not allowed
-
exploring binarized neural networks as potential candidates for privacy-preserving methods in sensitive speech classification tasks. The candidate will begin by reviewing the current state-of-the-art
-
of this thesis is to study the dependability characteristics of the Cosmos blockchain and develop methods and techniques to automate the testing of the PLD blockchain platform. BINDING LEGISLATION Law 40/2004
-
age estimation (FAE), specifically focusing on dental age assessment, as well as recent advancements in age estimation methods and Decision Support Systems (DSS) in medical diagnostics; (2) *Study and
-
clinical texts according to the ICD taxonomy, (b) explainability methods to be used in connection with models for clinical coding. BINDING LEGISLATION Law 40/2004 of 18th of August (Scientific Research
-
factor given to each parameter. In this process abstentions are not allowed. In the event of a tie among candidates with the same highest evaluation score, the Evaluation Panel reserves the right