Sort by
Refine Your Search
-
exploration, while actively shaping the future of dynamic systems theory. Only candidates with a Master’s degree should apply. The PhD researcher should have a strong interest in experimental testing, data
-
://research.rug.nl/(...)515/document_22_.pdf ) for comparative studies on different insect groups. Interdisciplinary focus: This project links Disciplines: comparative biology, optics and biophysics. Theory: optical
-
on media and journalism studies, digital literacy and inclusion, argumentation theory and AI, combining argumentation theory and affect theory to understand the intertwined processes of cognitive information
-
INOCULUM: to develop and validate a theory of stress to enable effective prevention of stress disorders, based on how children develop healthy stress responses to daily life stressors. The candidate we
-
theory and AI, combining argumentation theory and affect theory to understand the intertwined processes of cognitive information processing and affective sensemaking crucial for digital literacy. It asks
-
theory and real-world policy design. The PhD position is embedded in the Economics, Econometrics, and Finance research programme of FEB’s Research Institute. The project will be supervised by Dr Viktor
-
axioms of rational choice theory but also demonstrate consistency across different formulations of the same decision problem. Just as humans exhibit framing effects, AI models may reach contradictory
-
into argumentation, as developed in multimodal semiotics and superlinguistics, with evaluation-oriented theories of argumentation, as developed in formal dialectics, pragma-dialectics and normative pragmatics. The aim
-
stressors and helping them to train adequate stress responses. This is the goal of the project STRESS INOCULUM: to develop and validate a theory of stress to enable effective prevention of stress disorders
-
evaluation-oriented theories of argumentation, as developed in formal dialectics, pragma-dialectics and normative pragmatics. The aim is to shed light on how participants in argumentative practices do, can and